Bulwinkle at his studio in West Oakland, CA 1997
While Mark Bulwinkle was a student at the University of Pittsburgh his eyes were opened to the world of art. In 1972, four years after graduating, and a year spent in New York, he moved to the Bay Area. He decided to continue his art education at the San Francisco Art Institute, and in only eight months received his MFA. I remarked it was a pretty quick trip to the degree.
“Well, I’d been doing a lot of work,” he said.
No doubt, this was an understatement. A friend of mine had been in the same master’s program at SFAI with Bulwinkle. He told me, “Mark was an unstoppable force. At every critique, he’d haul in just a tremendous load of work. He sort of overwhelmed the art professors. Here was this big guy, and he’d pull out all this work and set it along the walls. Then he’d turn around and exclaim, ‘This is really great, isn’t it!’ and it just shut them all up.”
Mark Bulwinkle, Untitled, woodcut, 1983
In 1977, Bulwinkle moved to a quiet neighborhood in Oakland. He’d learned to weld soon after leaving the Art Institute and soon his little house on Manila Street was overflowing. Wild sculptures of torch-cut steel poured out into the yard and all available spaces, including the roof of his house. (Steel remains his main medium although he has worked in clay, has occasionally painted and has done many works on paper as well.)
Bulwinkle’s house on Manila Street quickly became a truly astonishing sight and before long was attracting a steady stream of the curious. Television people began to appear at his door. “Can we interview you? Do a piece for Channel Five?”
“How long did this go on?” I asked him.
“Let’s see. I lived there from 1977 to 1991, and it went on the whole time.”
But not once, I learned, did a television reporter get to do a story.
I learned about the television story when, in the course of conversation, I’d asked him something—probably philosophical—like “What do you think the real place of art in our society is today?” Right away, he warmed up to the subject.
Mark Bulwinkle, Untitled, woodcut, 1983
One reporter had been very persistent, he said. She’d schmoozed and cajoled in an effort to persuade Mark to allow her film crew set up and do a piece for a Bay Area news program. Retelling the story seemed to amuse him. It was more than that, though; from his pauses and the way he searched for the right way of putting it, I could see there was something that went deep in the incident. The reporter had tried one line of reasoning and then another, and finally, at her wit’s end, she’d thrown down her last, most compelling card: “Well, why did you make all this work if you didn’t want to be on television?”
Mark Bulwinkle, torch-cut steel, 1997
Bulwinkle repeated what she’d said as if hearing the pure strangeness of it couldn’t be grasped in just one telling.
“She just didn’t get it. I wasn’t interested in being on television. That just wasn’t what this is about. She just couldn’t understand that.”
A number of months later I happened to run into Mark having breakfast at a local restaurant. He had a story for me. He’d gotten an inquiry from the Oprah Winfrey show, could you believe? Would he be interested in making an appearance there? He told me that in response to the question, he’d said, “Why?”
That caused a short period of silence on the phone. This had to be a question the producer had never faced before. But it didn’t take her long to get right to the point. “Well, twenty or thirty million people would see your art.”
“Twenty or thirty million,” he repeated, in an even tone, looking at me in a way meant to convey the downright head-pounding challenge such an offer presented. “Did I understand?” his expression seemed to ask.
I nodded noncommittally.
He continued, “Well, just this morning I made a little note for myself,” he said, and pantomimed his big hands writing on a little pad of paper. “You know what it said?”
I shook my head.
Mark Bulwinkle, Untitled, woodcut, 1983
“All that was written on this note,” he said—and he raised his hand up as if to read what he’d written—“All it said was ‘Oprah, no.—’That’s what I’d written there. Just, ‘Oprah, no’.”
I tried to read his face for a clue. Joke? Man of principle? Scale tipped after a mighty internal struggle? Hopeless dreamer? All of the above?
Finally, I just laughed.
Bulwinkle smiled broadly.
Visit Mark Bulwinkle's website
Richard Whittaker is the founding editor of works & conversations and West Coast editor of Parabola magazine
TO OUR MONTHLY NEWSLETTER
Share Your Comments and Reflections on this Conversation:
On Apr 5, 2011 Cid Young & Kent Roberts wrote:
Mark- Reflecting back on when Kent and I knew you at SF Art Institute. I still love your work I remember the colorful silk screens you did with glossy ink Testors? Can't remember..burned too many brian cells since the Seventies! Hope that you are well. Maybe we can see you soon, are you still as reclusive as ever?-Ciddy
On Nov 26, 2009 BB Simmons wrote:
From a 30 minute piece on Mark for Public Access. Have a look he is so great!Fondly, Bb Simmons
On Sep 28, 2009 janet wrote:
Hi-- I had purchased some work, from you, many years back, actually me and my husband, now my exI am in an apartment and would like to "screen" my window from the neighbors....
(see I just want "decoaration" not art ? ! )
can i look at anything on-line ?
how are you doing anyways ?
On Dec 19, 2008 Mark Bulwinkle wrote:
Dear Rebecca Dworkin, while I do not think of you often, I do indeed think of you. (Believe me when I say that you do not want me thinking of you often). Thank you for your warm hearted remembrance in this season so cold. I wish you all the best way up north there. Be well! Mark BulwinkleOn Dec 19, 2008 Mark Bulwinkle wrote:
Dear Jan Kramer, besides offering you my appreciation for your appreciation, it is so good to hear about the old Larry and his Wife series I did so long ago. I often think about them and wonder what people thought about them as well as who bought them. Larry was a real person I knew for many years who, along with his much suffering wife, was the subject of, I am sure, that old blues line, "If it were not for bad luck I would have no luck at all." They both were, as you may suspect, the subject of some of my art back then. In the end, for Larry, his luck, or shall I say, lack thereof, finally ran out in Portland, Oregon when a load of scrap iron dropped on him while he was working on a ship at that Port about eight years ago. After all that happened and did not happen for and to Larry, you might say he was the beneficiary of ingots from heaven. No more will Larry have to suffer in this life. Let's hope heaven is just a little kinder. May peace have found Larry(and his wife). Mark BulwinkleOn Dec 19, 2008 Jan Kramer wrote:
I bought several pieces of Mr. Bullwinkle's work from the Jamison-Thomas Gallery in NYC in the later 80s. I have five pieces about Larry which I love and have moved several times. They are among my favorite pieces. Thanks, Mark, for enriching my life with your art.On Nov 4, 2008 Rebecca wrote:
Mark , just thinking of you ... remembering your generosity in giving a multi-hearted piece to honor Mary Cromwell , a courageous friend of mine . Remembering you & all your creative force , thanking you for it all . XO , Rebecca DworkinOn Oct 7, 2008 Mark Bulwinkle wrote:
Well put, Robert Denny. I do not remember you, but then I don't remember much. All the better to practice well squandered life of subjectivity.On Jul 7, 2008 Robert Denny (Kirk) wrote:
I knew Mark in the very late sixties (still in Pittsburgh) and visited him in his studio in NY in 1971 (tiny place in the Bowery overflowing with his work). This story tells me Mark hasn't change. All of his energy devoted to revealing his subjective world. He's right there in his own person, whole, no need for (other)wordly approval.